V.P. Nominee Palin v. Librarians
September 12, 2008
Within the librarian community there has been a tremendous rigmarole over Republican Vice President Nominee Governor Palin, stemming from real and fake issues. Unfortunately, some librarians were ready to steam roll her before checking their facts- without a doubt an uncommon and odd event. Librarians have a serious passion for disseminating information freely, without judgement, control from outside entities, and with equality and privacy. When we learn that someone in a position of power is trying to compromise that which we have a passion for … in short… all hell breaks loose. So much so that we lose ourselves in the scuffle and believe in wild accusations.
Rather then get into the Palin politics. I’d rather talk about some of the issues at hand and speak on behalf of myself as a librarian.
Contemporary American libraries are designed to accommodate a variety of cultures and peoples, catering to their likes and sensibilities. This includes sub-cultures and the occult. It isn’t for the library to decide whom to serve and whom not to serve. The library USED to do that when it went along with segregation and U.S. indoctrination of immigrants. However, we have progressed to a point of open and equal information distribution. While there may be titles in the library that even I don’t like, it isn’t for me or anyone else to decide that it is immoral and can’t be in the library. Sure the “Anarchist Cookbook” could be used for dastardly means, but it can also be used by police detectives. It isn’t for us to assume the usage. The goal of many public libraries is a well-rounded collection, so all patrons can find something of interest to them- collection development isn’t meant to enrage them. Patrons come with different beliefs and life experiences, so having the most diverse material is best.
When it comes to a children’s library you aren’t going to put a Chuck Palahaniuk title in there. However, if a teenager, pre-teen, child, etc. were to go into the adult section pick it up and check it out it isn’t for the library to stop them. Rather it is in the hands of the parents to monitor their children’s behavior. This issue goes deeper though. What if the parent wants a record of everything their child has checked out? The solution to this is that no library should have a record of old check outs, but only current items and late items. This is in the vein of privacy and protecting patrons’ information. I believe that parents have rights to access their children current checkouts, if the child is under 18. However, the library shouldn’t stop the child from checking something out; self-check completely renders human intervention ineffective. The library being unable to accommodate puts the impetus where it belongs, on the parents.
Every library has their own needs. Some libraries will allow parents to limit their childrens’ checkouts. It is up to the individual library branch/ district to determine their needs. However, no Government agency or outside force should infringe on a library decision. Libraries seek to do what is best for their patrons- not for a political agenda, moral high ground, or religious drive.
Now I present opposing blogs, for and against Palin:
http://librariansforpalin.com/
http://librariansagainstpalin.wordpress.com/
update thanks to my buddy Dan:
Entry Filed under: libraries. Tags: Palin, politics, Vice President.
5 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Perpetual Memory Loss | September 12, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Censorship in any form is scary, but for me, censorship of books is particularly disturbing.
2.
thedonofpages | September 14, 2008 at 11:10 am
You say that having self check machines means that teenagers can’t be prevented from checking out adult books. This is about the policy of librarians, not a technological barrier. I suspect that teenagers could be issued a library card that doesn’t have the privilege of checking out adult only books or DVD’s. At my library, the kid computers can use a printer for free. The adult computers use different printers that charge 15 cents per page. Adult cards don’t have the privilege to log in to the kid computers. This censorship on adult cards is considered appropriate.
3.
liskid | September 14, 2008 at 12:42 pm
@thedonofpages Thank you for your comment.
Making adults pay for prints isn’t censorship. Reserving computers for kids isn’t censorship of adults. It is a great idea for any library to have computers for kids only and free prints as well! Otherwise they may never be able to print or even get on a computer.
I understand the technology that could prohibit check outs. How do you decide what is adult material though? Would you prohibit someone who is under 10 from checking out a Shakespeare title because it is in the adult section. Or should the age be 12? These would become relative situations when the onus needs to be on parents/guardians, not librarians.
4.
librarychan | September 30, 2008 at 11:28 am
Very well put, Philippe.
I recently subscribed to the ALA-APA Forum listserv and this has been a very heated topic. (Since ALA is not allowed to endorse any political party due to their standing as a certain kind of not-for-profit organization, they’ve provided that alternative means.)
This is such an emotional and subjective issue. That’s why librarians should limit as little as possible. Public librarians are not responsible for the behavior of children. Parents need to own up to their responsibilities more.
And another point, to add to yours in the comments, is that some children read well above their grade level. Who are librarians to judge whether at a 12 year old should be able to read Nabokov? Their parents and teachers might totally support that.
5.
sandrar | September 10, 2009 at 7:21 am
Hi! I was surfing and found your blog post… nice! I love your blog.
Cheers! Sandra. R.